Women’s Gynecological Cancer Awareness: What is the Situation in North Cyprus?
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
VOLUME: 10 ISSUE: 3
P: 184 - 189
June 2025

Women’s Gynecological Cancer Awareness: What is the Situation in North Cyprus?

Cyprus J Med Sci 2025;10(3):184-189
1. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University Faculty of Medicine, Morphou, North Cyprus
2. Department of Nursing, Cyprus International University Faculty of Health Sciences, Nicosia, North Cyprus
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 20.12.2024
Accepted Date: 08.03.2025
Online Date: 27.06.2025
Publish Date: 27.06.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Awareness about gynecological cancers is important for cancer prevention. This study aimed to determine the awareness of women aged 20-65 living in North Cyprus regarding gynecological cancers and the relationship between these types of cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This research study was designed and conducted as a descriptive and cross-sectional study. As a result of the sample selection calculation made from the sample group whose population was known for the research, 400 voluntary women individuals were included. Participants who were living in North Cyprus, were married women between the ages of 20-65, who could read and write Turkish, and who did not have disabilities were included in the study. Data were collected using a form, and the general knowledge level of the participants as well as comparisons (socio-demographic characteristics and gynecological cancer statements) were determined. The data were collected by meeting participants face to face between 01 February and 30 April 2023.

RESULTS

The overall scale score average of women was determined as 150.76±25.98. Statistically significant findings were obtained when comparing the general average scale scores of the participants with their descriptive characteristics. A statistical significance was determined between scale general average scores, education level, occupation, income-expense status, knowledge about gynecological cancers, information source such as internet and scientific articles, reason for gynecological examination, and knowledge about early diagnosis of gynecological cancers (each, p=0.001) and birth control pill/medication use status (p=0.002) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

According to the study results, the awareness levels of the participants regarding gynecological cancers are above average. However, this result does not indicate the expected or desired level.

Keywords:
Awareness, cancer, North Cyprus, gynecological cancer, women

INTRODUCTION

According to World Health Organization data, cancer is the world’s leading cause of death and caused a total of 10 million deaths in 2020, equivalent to one in six deaths.1 It was reported by World Cancer Research Fund International that the five most common cancer types in women as of 2020 are breast (25.8%), colorectal (9.9%), lung (8.8%), cervix uteri (6.9%) and thyroid (5.1%). In the same report, ovarian (3.6%), vulva (0.5%), and vagina (0.2%) cancers and their rates are also stated.2

Gynecological cancers have many risk factors. These include alcohol, body mass index, individual factors, environmental causes, genetic predisposition, inactivity, hormonal factors, occupation, perinatal development, smoking, socio-economic status, viruses, and age.3, 4 Knowing such risk factors and increasing awareness of gynecological cancers in women are among the primary health care services in cancer prevention.5, 6 Thanks to awareness, positive results can be achieved in early diagnosis, treatment, and reducing mortality among women.7, 8

Based on this information, this study aimed to determine the awareness of women aged 20-65 living in North Cyprus regarding gynecological cancers. This study was conducted to determine the awareness of women aged 20-65 living in North Cyprus regarding gynecological cancers and the relationships between different types of these cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This research was designed and conducted as descriptive and cross-sectional. As a result of the sample selection calculation on a known population sample group, 400 people were included (n=400). As of the end of 2017, it was reported that the female population aged 20-65 in North Cyprus was 104,453 people.

The data were collected through a data collection form created by the researchers after reviewing the literature.9, 10 The form consists of two parts. The first section contains questions and statements indicating the descriptive characteristics of the participants. In the first section, consisting of 20 questions and statements in total, age, education level, employment status, occupation, income status, presence of health insurance, presence of children, number of children, number of pregnancies, age at first menstruation, use of birth control methods, and knowledge about gynecological cancers are collected. There is information about the patient’s condition, sources of information regarding the patient, reason for going to gynecological examination, frequency of examination, smoking and alcohol use, age at menopause, knowledge about early diagnosis methods, and family history of gynecological cancer.

The second part of the form includes the Gynecological Cancer Awareness Scale (GCAS). The scale developed by Alp Dal and Ertem11 consists of 41 items and four sub-dimensions. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was determined to be 0.94. 20th-41st years of GCAS. The items constitute the “Routine Control and Serious Disease Perception Awareness in Gynecological Cancers” subscale, and the Cronbach’s alpha value is 0.97. Levels 3-11 of the scale. The items are the “Gynecological Cancer Risks Awareness” subscale, for which the Cronbach’s alpha value is 0.84. 14th-19th on the scale. The items are the Gynecological Cancers Protection Awareness subscale, and the Cronbach’s alpha value is 0.77. 1st-2nd and 12th-13th grades in the scale. The items of the “Early Diagnosis and Information Awareness in Gynecological Cancers” subscale have a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.70. The scale is evaluated on a total score basis; a minimum of 41 and a maximum of 205 points can be obtained. As the average score that individuals receive on the scale increases, their awareness also increases.11

In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was determined as 0.94. Cronbach’s alpha values in sub-dimensions; Routine Control and Serious Disease Perception Awareness in Gynecological Cancers was found to be 0.94, Routine Control and Serious Disease Perception Awareness was 0.94, Gynecological Cancer Risks Awareness was 0.83, Gynecological Cancers Protection Awareness was 0.69, and Early Diagnosis and Information Awareness in Gynecological Cancers was found to be was 0.74.

The data was collected by meeting participants face to face between 01 February and 30 April 2023. Application of the data collection form took an average of 10-15 minutes. Participants who were living in North Cyprus and who were married women between the ages of 20-65, could read and write Turkish, and did not have visual, auditory or mental disabilities were included in the study.

To conduct the research, ethical permission was obtained from the Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University (approval number: KSTU/2023/145, date: 01.02.2023); scale permission was obtained from the authors who conducted the GCSA Turkish validity and reliability study; and written consent was obtained from the participants who were included in the study during the data collection process.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences 25.0 program was used for the statistical analysis of the data. The distributions of the descriptive characteristics of the participants are determined as numbers (n) and percentages (%) and are shown in tables. The average values of the scale are calculated as mean ± standard deviation and are presented in the tables. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z test was applied to evaluate whether the data conformed to the normal distribution. It was determined that the data did not conform to a normal distribution. Accordingly, Mann-Whitney U (U) tests were applied for binary variables, and Kruskal-Wallis H (X2) tests were applied for more than two variables, and the results are given in the comparison tables. Pearson correlation analysis (r) was applied to determine the correlation between descriptive features and scale score average. Data were evaluated and interpreted at a 95% confidence interval and a significance level of p<0.05.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the participants’ mean scores on the scale and its subscales. Women’s GCSA general score average was 150.76±25.98. The mean score of the Routine Control and Serious Disease Perception Awareness in Gynecological Cancers Sub-Dimension is 85.50±17.05, the Gynecological Cancer Risks Awareness Sub-Dimension is 27.71±6.92, the Gynecological Cancer Protection Awareness Sub-Dimension is 21.07±4.89, and the Early Diagnosis and Information Awareness in Gynecological Cancers Sub-Dimension is 27.71±6.92. The average score was found to be 16.47±3.29 (Table 1).

The average age of the participants in the study was found to be 40.26±11.44. 40% (n=160) of the women were university graduates, 77% (n=308) were working, and 22% (n=88) were working in the management-civil service field, 47% (n=188) had income, and it was determined that their expenses were balanced, while 52% (n=208) did not have health insurance. 67.5% (n=270) of the participants had children, 32.5% (n=130) had two children, and 31% (n=124) had two pregnancies. The average age of women’s first menstrual period is 12.11±2.92. Seventy-five percent (n=300) of the participants did not use birth control pills/medicines, 71% (n=284) had information about gynecological cancers, 32.5% (n=130) said their source of information was the internet, 45.5% (n=182) had a gynecological examination when they had any complaints, 34% (n=136) had a gynecological examination once a year, and 26% (n=104) smoked while 28% (n=112) consumed alcohol. This information has been detected. The average age of women at menopause is 47.55±6.45. It was determined that 42% (n=168) of the participants did not have sufficient knowledge about gynecological cancer early diagnosis methods and 30% (n=120) had a family history of gynecological cancer (Table 2).

The distribution of participants’ GCSA general average scores is shown in Table 2. The variables with the five highest awareness levels are: 1) Individuals whose source of information is scientific articles (163.00±13.32) (highest), 2) Individuals whose profession is in the field of management-civil service (160.43±23.29), 3) Individuals who have a postgraduate education (158.87±15.86), 4) Individuals who are women who have three children (158.60±25.62), and 5) Individuals whose income exceeds their expenses (157.86±25.18). The variables with the lowest awareness level are 1) Literacy level (124.00 ± 25.40), which is the lowest, 2) Not having a gynecological examination (136.32±35.95), 3) Not having knowledge about gynecological cancers (139.17±26.53), (4) Working in the health profession group (140.12±31.51) and having more than three children (142.62±25.98) (Table 2).

Statistically significant findings, were obtained when comparing the GCSA general average scores of the participants with their descriptive characteristics. Scale general average scores and education level, occupation, income status, knowledge about gynecological cancers, information source (internet and scientific articles), reason for going to gynecological examination, knowledge about early diagnosis of gynecological cancers (each; p=0.001) and statistical significance was determined between birth control pill/medication use status (p=0.002) (p<0.05) (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

In this study, which investigated the awareness of gynecological cancers and the relationship between them among women aged 20-65 living in North Cyprus, the participants’ overall scale score average was determined as 150.76±25.98. This result can indicate that women’s awareness levels are above average. There are studies in the literature with similar results across different populations.

In Kıyak and Burucu10 research examining university students’ awareness of gynecological cancers and related factors, the overall score average of the scale was found to be 154.5, and in Kaya Şenol et al.9 study on women of reproductive age and postmonopausal period, it was found to be 150.7. In Özcan and Demir Doğan12 study, the average score was determined as 150.53, and in Teskereci et al.13study, it was 151.08. The reason women’s awareness of gynecological cancers is above average is their high level of education. In the study, 342 women had an equivalent education level of high school or above.

In the study, statistical significance was determined among variables such as women’s education level, occupation, financial status, birth control pill/medication use, knowledge about gynecological cancers, reasons for gynecological examination, and knowledge about early diagnosis of gynecological cancers. In Öztürk et al.14 study, a statistically significant relationship was found between the general score average and financial status. In Atlas and Er Güneri5 study, statistical significance was determined among the scale’s overall score average and the variables of education level, profession, and reason for applying to the polyclinic.

In the study of Alp Dal et al.7 statistical significance was found between the general score average, knowledge about female reproductive organ cancers, and knowledge about early diagnosis of female cancers. Socio-demographic conditions, such as education level, related profession, and economic status, can affect awareness levels positively and/or negatively. In addition, awareness of situation-specific factors such as gynecological cancers, prevention methods, and early diagnosis may affect the awareness of the subject.

The study also includes the general averages of the scale scores and the relationships resulting from the correlation analysis. Accordingly, occupation, income-expense status, birth control pill/medication use status, knowledge about gynecological cancers, internet information source, scientific article information source, and gynecological cancer early diagnosis knowledge status were determined as related factors. In the study of Teskereci et al.13, knowledge about gynecological cancers was identified as a contributing factor. In the study of Erenoglu and Bayraktar15, knowledge about gynecological cancers was stated as a statistical factor.

There is a limited amount of literature measuring gynecological cancer awareness. In the literature, it is possible to find awareness studies focused primarily on a single type, such as cervical, ovarian, or endometrial cancer. Gynecological cancers continue to exist as an important public health issue. It is important to determine awareness levels and increase investments in education and medical research for the future so that precautions can be taken in this area. However, it should be noted that the most important issue is education.16

Study Limitations

The study group, women aged 20-65 living in the North part of Cyprus, can be considered a limitation of the study. The results should not be generalized to the whole world or a larger group.

CONCLUSION

According to the study results, the awareness levels of the participants regarding gynecological cancers are above average. However, this result does not indicate the expected and/or desired level. It may be recommended to conduct more research on the lack of information on the subject in the literature, enhance public health training for awareness, focus on programs, and make educational investments, such as informative advertisements, posters, and brochures, at the public level on the subject.

MAIN POINTS

• Gynecological cancers account for a significant number of cancer-related deaths worldwide (10 million as of 2020).

• The knowledge of women who participated in the study about gynecological cancers was determined to be at a moderate level (150.76±25.98).

• Individuals’ level of education, field of work, income level, birth control method, knowledge about gynecological cancers, information sources, reasons for gynecological examination, and knowledge of early diagnosis methods are significant factors affecting their knowledge levels (p<0.05).

• Information sources are scientific articles and the knowledge levels of people working as management/officer servants are higher.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study received approval from Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University Ethics Committee (approval number: KSTU/2023/145, date: 01.02.2023).
Informed Consent: Written consent was obtained from the participants who were included in the study during the data collection process.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: A.T., U.K., Design: A.T., U.K., Data Collection and/or Processing: A.T., U.K., Analysis and/or Interpretation: A.T., U.K., Literature Search: A.T., U.K., Writing: A.T., U.K.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study had received no financial support.

References

1
Cancer. World Health Organization; 2022. Cancer. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer
2
World Cancer Research Fund International; 2022. Available from: https://www.wcrf.org/preventing-cancer/cancer-statistics/worldwide-cancer-data/
3
Gözüyeşil E, Arıöz DA, Ünal AKS. Kadınların serviks kanserinden korunma ve erken tanıya yönelik tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. STED. 2019; 28(4): 228-37.
4
Teskereci G, Öncel S, Özer Arslan Ü. Evaluation of the Women Attending Vocational Courses in Terms of Risk Factors and Early Warning Signs Related to Gynaecological Cancers. Sted. 2020; 29(4): 229-238.
5
Atlas B, Er Güneri S. Kadınların Jinekolojik Kanserlerle İlgili Farkındalığı ve Farkındalığı Etkileyen Faktörler. İKÇÜSBFD. 2022; 7(1): 77-85.
6
Eroğlu K, Koç G. Jinekolojik Kanser Kontrolü ve Hemşirelik. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 1(2): 77-90.
7
Alp Dal N, Akkuzu G, Çetinkaya Şen Y. UFUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ KADIN ÇALIŞANLARININ JİNEKOLOJİK KANSER FARKINDALIĞININ İNCELENMESİ. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences. 2020; 3(2): 91-9.
8
Köse S, Karakurt P. kadınların jinekolojik kanserler ile ilgili farkındalık düzeyinin artmasında sağlık okuryazarlığının etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. mersin üniversitesi tıp fakültesi lokman hekim tıp tarihi ve folklorik tıp dergisi. 2023; 13(1): 196-206.
9
Kaya Şenol D, Polat F, Doğan M. Gynecological Cancer Awareness: Reproductive Age and Postmenopausal Women. TJFMPC. 2021; 15(1): 56-62.
10
Kıyak S, Burucu R. Gynecological Cancer Awareness of University Students and Related Factors. Sted. 2022; 31(3): 172-182.
11
Alp Dal N, Ertem G. JİNEKOLOJİK KANSERLER FARKINDALIK ÖLÇEĞİ GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017; 6(5): 2351-2367.
12
Özcan H, Demir Doğan M. Gynecological Cancer Awareness Among Women. Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2021: 19(13): 1-9.
13
Teskereci G, Arslan ÜÖ, Öncel S. The awareness levels of women for gynecologic cancer in Turkey: A cross-sectional study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022; 156(3): 539-45.
14
Öztürk R, Bakir S, Kazankaya F, Paker S, Ertem G. Awareness about Gynecologic Cancers and Related Factors among Healthy Women: a cross- sectional study. Soc Work Public Health. 2021; 36(7-8): 847-56.
15
Erenoglu R, Bayraktar E. Awareness Levels of Married Women Aged 20-60 Years about Gynaecological Cancer and the Affecting Factors. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2020; 13(1): 457.
16
Novinson D, Puckett M, Townsend J, Reichhardt M, Tareg A, Palemar J, et al. Increasing Awareness of Gynecologic Cancer Risks and Symptoms among Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Women in the US-Associated Pacific Island Jurisdictions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017; 18(8): 2127-33.