Wearable Technologies and Psychiatry: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Review
VOLUME: 10 ISSUE: 2
P: 111 - 115
April 2025

Wearable Technologies and Psychiatry: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis

Cyprus J Med Sci 2025;10(2):111-115
1. Department of Nursing, İstanbul Aydın University Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye
2. Koç University, School of Nursing, İstanbul, Türkiye
3. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Koç University College of Engineering, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 09.07.2024
Accepted Date: 24.01.2025
Online Date: 18.04.2025
Publish Date: 18.04.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

As in every other field, technology has an impact on healthcare. As part of technological advancements, wearable technology can guide in identifying illnesses, clarifying diagnoses, and recognizing disease-related hazards early. Considering the advances in wearable technologies impact the mental health field, as they do in all other fields, it is important to assess their implications. Studies in this field and their results will be discussed, and current shortcomings and developments will be revealed. Considering disability, economic burden, and care burden, wearable technology for mental illness is also promising. Although it is generally in the pilot study phase, wearable technology will likely be encountered more frequently in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of mental illnesses with the increase of prospective randomized controlled studies in the near future. The collection of simultaneous and objective data in patients will also benefit evidence-based mental care. Nevertheless, it is imperative to address the matter of patients’ privacy and ethical concerns associated with the utilization of wearable technology, given its potential to gather extensive and prolonged data without being driven by specific hypotheses.

Keywords:
Wearable technologies, psychiatry, psychiatric care

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization has encouraged the integration of assistive technology into health reform initiatives.1 Today, digital health tools and technology have emerged as promising advancements that substantially assist in identifying disorders and clarifying diagnoses.2 Technology has played a key role in providing health services, particularly in domains such as mobile health, monitoring, data collection, warning systems, and record-keeping. Mobile health, previously referred to as wireless e-medicine, now encompasses the utilization of mobile or wireless communication devices in the context of health and healthcare services.3-6 The wearable devices were first designed by Thorp Edward7 and implemented with contributions from Claude Shannon. In recent times, the utilization of wearable technology in mobile health services has enabled the monitoring of various health issues and has presented novel solutions in both the scientific and industrial fields.8-10 Wearable devices enable monitoring, recording, and transmitting physiological signals in non-hospital settings.11 This review comprehensively examines the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with wearable technology, a rapidly emerging phenomenon in the healthcare domain. Furthermore, it investigates specific instances of wearable technologies within the field of psychiatry. The aim of this review is not to emphasize statistical results but to focus on the advantages and the disadvantages.

Wearable Technology

Wearable technologies encompass electronic devices that are designed to be conveniently worn on the human body or effortlessly integrated into clothing.12, 13 Wearable technologies that can be attached to or integrated with the human skin enable the continuous and unobtrusive monitoring of humans; hence, minimizing disruptions to their everyday routines.14 Wearable devices include smart gloves, smart watches, patched or patch-like systems, head-worn devices, and eyeglasses. The use of wearable technology enables the concurrent and optimally effective surveillance of patients’ physiological parameters, which is a widely sought-after scenario in the healthcare field.15, 16 Wearable devices encompass primary functionalities, including user interface, communication, data management, energy management, and integrated circuits.17 These devices are equipped with microprocessors and have been designed to transmit and receive data through the Internet.18 Wearable technologies, characterized by the integration of microchips and sensors, are experiencing tremendous growth and are poised to exert even more significant influence in the future.19 With the help of these devices, results such as biological feedback, psychological state assessment, and perception, which are not available on mobile phones and computers can be obtained.20 Interest in this field has increased due to the monitoring, recording, and transmission of physiological signals.

Wearable Technology and Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis

Strengths (Opportunities and Strengths) of Wearable Technology

Wearable technology devices enable data collection in the natural environment of patients.21 Since these measurements are taken instantaneously and objectively from individuals, they may provide a better source of data than cross-sectional data collected by notification in a clinical setting. It can also be used to monitor treatment results.22 In wearable technology, the data flow is continuous, and data can be collected automatically without the participant having to do anything. This prevents professionals from constantly asking patients for feedback and saves patients from answering questions. These questions continuously asked to the patients may create the risk of that reminding them of the symptoms of the disease, which may lead to changes in behavior and data.23, 24

Potential Problems (Weaknesses and Threats) Related to Wearable Technology

In a scoping review on wearable technologies and their reflections on the field of health, it was reported that, in the examined studies, the focus was on the positive aspects of wearable technology, generally omitting negative ones.25 However, despite the advances in wearable technology that have been and will be reflected in the clinical field, there are also a few concerns. One of these concerns is the possibility of collecting vast longitudinal data from individuals without a hypothesis basis for analysis. Big data entails difficult analyses. Physiological signals exhibit high inter-subject and intra-subject variability, challenging the development of generalizable models. Additionally, motion artifacts and other interference sources might dominate the clinically important information embedded in the signals. That is why well-designed pre-processing frameworks are crucial for cleaner signals and accurate models. In addition, some technological accidents may be encountered during the data collection phase. Power outages or battery failure may cause data loss.22

Analyses of big data are possible with the support or cooperation of fields such as engineering or mathematics. This situation brings risks related to data security and patient privacy. For wearable technology studies to be acceptable to patients, they must be conducted openly and protected.22 The United Kingdom’s Department of Health and Social Care has published guidelines summarising and targeting key principles for safe and effective digital innovations. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency has also published guidance for determining whether software and healthcare applications are medical devices.26

Patient participation and the sustainability of the studies are also important. In a study conducted on clinically hospitalized adolescents at risk of suicide, patients reported that the most enjoyable part was participating, especially since it could help people with similar problems in the future;27 however, more studies are needed to generalize this result.28, 29 It is important for progress in this area to articulate how wearable devices are being adopted by users and how barriers to their widespread use are being addressed.30

Wearable Technology and Mental Health

Mental illnesses are among the major causes of social and global disability.31 Serious mental illnesses affect many individuals worldwide, and disorders such as depression and anxiety lead to reduced productivity and economic losses.32 According to the global burden of disease reports, five of the twenty diseases in the burden of disease ranking are related to mental health issues.33

Utilizing technological advancements in psychiatry is an essential issue, considering the  disease and financial burdens. Recently, measurement-based care has been emphasized and recommended as a basis for improving the quality of mental health services.34, 35 Wearable technology can improve patient outcomes through safely and objectively assessing patients with psychiatric disorders.36 The use of digital tools in the field of psychiatry also benefits the dissemination of evidence-based practices. Evidence-based psychiatric care is not available in many parts of many developing and some developed countries. Inter-institutional reports related to the treatment compliance of patients with severe mental illness indicate that evidence-based treatment and care are applied in only 2% of cases.37, 38 In this context, the utilization of wearable technology can provide valuable objective data and measurements that can significantly contribute to the field in terms of patient follow-up and therapy.

Robinson et al.39analyzed 12 articles in a systematic review of wearable technologies used in mental illnesses. It was determined that bioparameters such as electrodermal activity/galvanic skin resistance/skin conductance/skin temperature, physical activity, and heart rate (HR) were mostly evaluated with wearable technology, considering the results of the reviewed articles. Information on the monitoring of physiological parameters is provided in Figure 1.

Wearable technologies can also enable early recognition of risks of self-harm or harm to other persons by monitoring physiological or potential acute behavioral changes. One of these parameters is early recognition of the risk of self-harm through sleep monitoring. For example, sleep data can be assessed as a potential predictive factor for the risk of self-harm and used in preventative measures.40 Studies have shown that too much or too little sleep can trigger, accelerate, and perpetuate depression.41 A study conducted with sensor-based sleep durations reported that sleep duration was effective in predicting suicidal ideation the next day, and this effect was similar to subjective sleep data.42 In another study conducted on undergraduate and graduate students, the usefulness of wearable devices in predicting the severity of depression symptoms was examined. As a result of the study, it was reported that fluctuations in sleep efficiency can be measured with wearable devices, which may be associated with depression severity.43

HR may be another method used to predict self-harm behavior. In a study of patients at risk of self-harm in an acute adolescent psychiatric clinic, Sheridan et al.44assessed patients’ HRs for seven days with wearable technology devices, and self-harm risk with Columbia Suicide Severity Scores. An inverse correlation was found between the parasympathetic values measured in the study results and the risk of self-harm. The HR variable measured by wearable technology devices decreased in patients diagnosed with depression at the same time without an accompanying cardiovascular disease.45-47 Depression was inversely associated with physical activity measured from patients.48, 49 A wearable device implanted in the skin may have acted as a biomarker for depression.50, 51 HR is also one of the most effective methods for detecting and monitoring stress and anxiety in individuals.52

According to the results of a study conducted with medical students, mobile mood monitoring with the help of wearable sensors was effective in predicting students’ depression.53 Changes in sleep patterns and physical activities assessed by wearable technology may give clues about depression and anxiety disorders.24 In some mental disorders, there is a more pronounced sympathetic nervous system activation. This is similar to the fight or flight response to physical danger or mental stress. This change can also be assessed with wearable technology, and used in the diagnostic phase of mental illnesses.24

Real-time physiological parameters obtained through wearable technology can be used to improve traditional mental health interventions such as therapy or medication It can also be used to guide the selection of the most appropriate treatment.54, 55 These parameters involve using objective data in diagnosis and treatment selection. For example, Collier et al.56 reported that the motion measurement technology used in the study helps clinicians with early diagnosis by assessing gait, balance, and postural kinematics. Objective and systematic data are important for developing and supporting evidence-based psychiatric practice in diagnosis and care provision. Wearable technology devices may also be useful in supporting interventions to improve cardiometabolic health in patients with schizophrenia. It is also reported that wearable devices support patient weight loss, and may be effective in improving lifestyle.57

In addition to all these positive developments, Haines-Delmont et al.58 used machine learning to analyze sensor and mobile data to assess the suicidal thoughts of patients discharged from a psychiatric hospital in the first week. The study results were reported as poor in terms of overall predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Considering the historical problems in mental health services and the burden of disability, economic challenges, and care needs in mental illnesses, wearable technologies may promise hope for the development of mental health services. Simultaneous and objective monitoring of symptoms can contribute to evidence-based psychiatric care and positively affect patient care. However, most wearable technologies are still in the prototype stage. In a review of wearable technology in child and adolescent psychiatry,  most of the studies are pilot studies, and randomized controlled studies are needed. The population in which wearable technology is applied, the generalizability of patient results, and patient feedback while using these devices will contribute to the shaping of these studies. Issues such as acceptance of the applied population, safety, ethics, privacy, and big data concerns in wearable technology need to be addressed to improve the availability and functionality of these devices for practical use.

Relevance Statement

Wearable technology provides us with objective data for monitoring and controlling existing risks. These objective data can help psychiatric nurses to make clinical decisions. It can help them recognize potential risks earlier and shape their care accordingly.

MAIN POINTS

• Considering the advancements of wearable technologies impact the mental health field, as they do in all other fields.

• Studies in this field and their results will be discussed, and current shortcomings and developments will be revealed.

• Wearable technologies in psychiatry will be evaluated through a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis, highlighting their practice potential and ethical concerns. Wearable technologies in psychiatry will be evaluated through a SWOT analysis, highlighting their practice potential and ethical concerns.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: F.O., T.Ş.T., B.S., Design: F.O., T.Ş.T., B.S., Data Collection or Processing: F.O., T.Ş.T., B.S., Analysis and/or Interpretation: F.O., T.Ş.T., B.S., Literature Search: F.O., T.Ş.T., B.S., Writing: F.O., T.Ş.T., B.S.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study had received no financial support.

References

1
World Health Organization. Global report on assistive technology. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
2
Bulut A. Sağlık hizmetlerinde nesnelerin interneti. Dijital Etkileşimler: Sektörel Yansımaları. 2022; 1: 23.
3
Istepanian RSH, Laxminarayan S, Swamy L. UNWIRED E-MED: the next generation of wireless and internet telemedicine systems. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2000; 4(3): 189-93.
4
Istepanian Robert SH, Jose C Lacal. Emerging mobile communication technologies for health: some imperative notes on m-health. In: 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2003.
5
Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. Can mobile health technologies transform health care? JAMA. 2013; 310(22): 2395-6.
6
Silva BM, Rodrigues JJ, de la Torre Díez I, López-Coronado M, Saleem K. Mobile-health: a review of current state in 2015. J Biomed Inform. 2015; 56: 265-72.
7
Thorp Edward O. The invention of the first wearable computer. Digest of Papers. 1998.
8
Nisha N, Iqbal M, Rifat A. Exploring the role of service quality and knowledge for mobile health services. Int J E-Bus Res. 2016; 12(2): 45-64.
9
Chen L, Liu X, Peng L, Wu M. Deep learning based multimodal complex human activity recognition using wearable devices. Applied Intelligence. 2021; 51(6): 4029-42.
10
Awotunde JB, Adeniyi AE, Ogundokun RO, Ajamu GJ, Adebayo PO. MIoT-based big data analytics architecture, opportunities and challenges for enhanced telemedicine systems. Enhanced Telemedicine and e-Health; 2021; pp. 199-220.
11
Rutherford JJ. Wearable technology. Health-care solutions for a growing global population. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2010; 29(3): 19-24.
12
Lymberis A, Gatzoulis L. Wearable health systems: from smart technologies to real applications. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;(Suppl):6789-92.
13
Raad H. Fundamentals of IoT and wearable technology design. John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
14
Gao W, Emaminejad S, Nyein HYY, Challa S, Chen K, Peck A, et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature. 2016; 529(7587): 509-14.
15
Tak J, Woo S, Kwon J, Choi J. Dual-band dual-mode patch antenna for on-/off-body WBAN communications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters. 2015; 15 (99): 348-51.
16
Farrokhi A, Farahbakhsh R, Rezazadeh J, Minerva R. Application of internet of things and artificial intelligence for smart fitness: a survey. Comput Netw. 2021; 189: 107859.
17
Çiçek M. Wearable technologies and its future applications. Int J Electr Electron Data Commun. 2015; 3(4): 45-50.
18
Hofmann SG, Curtiss JE, Hayes SC. Beyond linear mediation: toward a dynamic network approach to study treatment processes. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020; 76: 101824.
19
Thierer AD. “The internet of things and wearable technology: addressing privacy and security concerns without derailing innovation." 2015; 21 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 6. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2494382 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2494382
20
Tehrani K, Michael A. Wearable technology and wearable devices: everything you need to know. Wearable Devices Magazine; 2014; 26.
21
Bidargaddi N, Musiat P, Makinen VP, Ermes M, Schrader G, Licinio J. Digital footprints: facilitating large-scale environmental psychiatric research in naturalistic settings through data from everyday technologies. Mol Psychiatry. 2017; 22(2): 164-9.
22
Griffin B, Saunders KEA. Smartphones and wearables as a method for understanding symptom mechanisms. Front Psychiatry. 2020; 10: 949.
23
Dagum Paul. “Digital biomarkers of cognitive function.” NPJ Digital Medicine. 2018; 1: 10.
24
Gomes N, Pato M, Lourenco AR, Datia N. A survey on wearable sensors for mental health monitoring. Sensors. 2023; 23(3): 1330.
25
Huhn S, Axt M, Gunga HC, Maggioni MA, Munga S, Obor D, et al. The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(1): e34384.
26
UK Government Website. Good Clinical Practice for Clinical Trials. [Accessed 12 June 2023]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/good-clinical-practice-for-clinical-trials
27
Kleiman E, Millner AJ, Joyce VW, Nash CC, Buonopane RJ, Nock MK. Using wearable physiological monitors with suicidal adolescent inpatients: feasibility and acceptability study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 0(0): e13725.
28
Sergueeva K, Norman S, Seung HL. Understanding the barriers and factors associated with consumer adoption of wearable technology devices in managing personal health. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration. 2020; 37(1): 45-60.
29
Sinha N, Manali G. Taxonomy of wearable devices: a systematic review of literature. International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD). 2019; 10(2): 1-17.
30
Gao H, Keryn L. Proton-conducting polymer electrolytes and their applications in solid supercapacitors: a review. RSC advances. 2014; 4(62): 33091-113.
31
World Health Organization. Global strategic direction for mental health 2022-2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
32
The Lancet Global Health. Mental health matters. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8(11): e1352.
33
Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3(2): 171-8.
34
Schalper KA, Brown J, Carvajal-Hausdorf D, McLaughlin J, Velcheti V, Syrigos KN, et al. Objective measurement and clinical significance of TILs in non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107(3): dju435.
35
Fortney JC, Unützer J, Wrenn G, Pyne JM, Smith GR, Schoenbaum M, et al. A tipping point for measurement-based care. Psychiatr Serv. 2017; 68(2): 179-88.
36
Van Meter AR, Burke C, Youngstrom EA, Faedda GL, Correll CU. The bipolar prodrome: meta-analysis of symptom prevalence prior to initial or recurrent mood episodes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016; 55(7): 543-55.
37
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): Mental Health, United States, 2010. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 12-4681. 2012. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/MHUS2010/MHUS2010/MHUS-2010.pdf
38
Interdepartmental Serious Mental Illness Coordinating Committee (ISMICC): The Way Forward: Federal Action for a System That Works for All People Living With SMI and SED and Their Families and Caregivers. ISMICC, 2017. https://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//PEP17-ISMICC-RTC/PEP17-ISMICC-RTC.pdf. Accessed Jan 15, 2018
39
Robinson T, Condell J, Ramsey E, Leavey G. Self-management of subclinical common mental health disorders (anxiety, depression and sleep disorders) using wearable devices. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3): 2636.
40
Johnson KB, Wei WQ, Weeraratne D, Frisse ME, Misulis K, Rhee K, et al. Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clin Transl Sci. 2021; 14(1): 86-93.
41
Zhai L, Zhang H, Zhang D. Sleep duration and depression among adults: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Depress Anxiety. 2015; 32(9): 664-70.
42
Littlewood DL, Kyle SD, Carter LA, Peters S, Pratt D, Gooding P. Short sleep duration and poor sleep quality predict next-day suicidal ideation: an ecological momentary assessment study. Psychol Med. 2019; 49(3): 403-11.
43
Lim JA, Yun JY, Choi SH, Park S, Suk HW, Jang JH. Greater variability in daily sleep efficiency predicts depression and anxiety in young adults: estimation of depression severity using the two-week sleep quality records of wearable devices. Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13: 1041747.
44
Sheridan DC, Domingo KN, Dehart R, Baker SD. Heart rate variability duration: expanding the ability of wearable technology to improve outpatient monitorin? Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12: 682553.
45
Carney RM, Freedland KE. Depression and heart rate variability in patients with coronary heart disease. Cleve Clin J Med. 2009; 76 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S13-7.
46
Kemp AH, Quintana DS, Gray MA, Felmingham KL, Brown K, Gatt JM. Impact of depression and antidepressant treatment on heart rate variability: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 67(11): 1067-74.
47
Zhu J, Ji L, Liu C. Heart rate variability monitoring for emotion and disorders of emotion. Physiol Meas. 2019; 40(6): 064004.
48
Vallance JK, Winkler EA, Gardiner PA, Healy GN, Lynch BM, Owen N. Associations of objectively-assessed physical activity and sedentary time with depression: NHANES (2005-2006). Prev Med. 2011; 53(4-5): 284-8.
49
Lee S, Kim H, Park MJ, Jeon HJ. Current advances in wearable devices and their sensors in patients with depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021: 12; 672347.
50
Ward NG, Doerr HO, Storrie MC. Skin conductance: a potentially sensitive test for depression. Psychiatry Res. 1983; 10(4): 295-302.
51
Ward NG, Doerr HO. Skin conductance. A potentially sensitive and specific marker for depression. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986; 174(9): 553-9.
52
Hickey BA, Chalmers T, Newton P, Lin CT, Sibbritt D, McLachlan CS, et al. Smart devices and wearable technologies to detect and monitor mental health conditions and stress: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(10): 3461.
53
Horwitz A, Czyz E, Al-Dajani N, Dempsey W, Zhao Z, Nahum-Shani I, et al. Utilizing daily mood diaries and wearable sensor data to predict depression and suicidal ideation among medical interns. J Affect Disord. 2022; 313: 1-7.
54
McGinnis RS, McGinnis EW, Petrillo CJ, Price M. Mobile biofeedback therapy for the treatment of panic attacks: a pilot feasibility study. In 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN). IEEE. 2019; 1-4.
55
Hilty D, Chan S, Torous J, Luo J, Boland R. A Framework for competencies for the use of mobile technologies in psychiatry and medicine: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(2): e12229.
56
Collier S, Monette P, Hobbs K, Tabasky E, Forester BP, Vahia IV. Mapping movement: applying motion measurement technologies to the psychiatric care of older adults. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018; 20(8): 64.
57
Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Scherer EA, McHugo GJ, Marsch LA, Bartels SJ. Wearable devices and mobile technologies for supporting behavioral weight loss among people with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Res. 2016; 244: 139-44.
58
Haines-Delmont A, Chahal G, Bruen AJ, Wall A, Khan CT, Sadashiv R, et al. Testing suicide risk prediction algorithms using phone measurements with patients in acute mental health settings: feasibility study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(6): e15901.